Senate Blue Ribbon Committee Resumes Flood Control Anomaly Hearing
20 January 2026
The Senate Blue Ribbon Committee resumes its inquiry into alleged corruption and irregularities in government-funded flood control projects.

The Senate Blue Ribbon Committee has resumed its high-profile investigation into alleged irregularities surrounding government-funded flood control projects, renewing scrutiny over what lawmakers describe as one of the most serious public fund controversies in recent years.
During the latest hearing, senators focused on claims involving questionable project validation and inspection procedures, including allegations that incorrect grid coordinates were submitted by former officials of the Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH). These discrepancies reportedly resulted in inspection teams being unable to locate hundreds of flood control projects, raising serious concerns over data accuracy, transparency, and accountability within the agency.
Officials from the DPWH were expected to provide clarification as the committee examined whether the submission of erroneous project data was accidental or intentional. Senators also questioned how existing oversight mechanisms failed to detect or prevent irregularities at an early stage, despite the scale and funding of the projects involved.
Concerns over alleged massive kickbacks linked to flood control works were once again highlighted during the session. Lawmakers recalled earlier testimony from a former DPWH undersecretary who claimed that multi-billion peso commissions were tied to senior officials, intensifying calls for deeper investigation into the flow of public funds.
Committee chair Senate President Pro Tempore Panfilo “Ping” Lacson addressed criticism questioning the effectiveness of the inquiry, emphasizing that the investigation has already yielded concrete outcomes. According to Lacson, the hearings have contributed to cases filed before the Sandiganbayan and to asset freezes connected to the controversy. He stressed that accountability would be driven by evidence and due process rather than public pressure.
Previous hearings uncovered testimony from former DPWH engineers and whistleblowers alleging systematic fraud, ghost infrastructure projects, substandard construction, and entrenched kickback schemes related to flood control funding. These revelations fueled public outrage and strengthened demands for institutional reform and accountability.
The resumption of the hearings underscores the Senate’s determination to unravel the alleged misuse of billions of pesos allocated for critical flood mitigation infrastructure, which is intended to protect communities from recurring natural disasters. The committee is also expected to examine possible involvement by individuals beyond the executive branch, amid criticism that earlier investigations focused primarily on lower-ranking officials.
As the inquiry continues, the panel may issue show-cause orders and summon additional resource persons to address inconsistencies in testimony and documentation. Further hearings are anticipated in the coming weeks as the Senate presses forward in its pursuit of accountability and transparency in the use of public funds.